Week 5 prompt

How do you judge the value of expertise on the Web? Does it differ from your notion of expertise in face-to-face settings? Why or why not?

In face-to-face setting, I would think that officially expertise would require both qualification he/she receives and deep professional experience before they can be viewed as experts. The qualification comes through professional training or academic certification and years on specific experience on the subject. For example, in civil engineering, you need to have a degree and 10 years of consulting with site experience before you can apply to be a professional engineer to certify structural designs. On the other hand, there are people who may not have the academic qualification but have years of deep experience on the subject (e.g. car mechanics), this I would term as unofficial type of experts.

In web setting, experts are probably people who provide high quality contributions to the online community through their blogs, comments, posts and articles. However it is difficult to determine the qualification or experiences in the web setting thus their contributions represents their value and expertise. A measure of their value can be quantified by the amount of followers or likes on their articles. Some web blogs that generate high rate traffic sometimes get the attention of companies who will offer pay the blogger to write about the company as a form of marketing strategy (e.g. food industry). There are web base communities that rank their members the amount of contributions they have made however I would argue that not all contributions value adds to the community. Hence it would be important that all web users to exercise discretion on the information provided. I think in a web setting everyone can be in someway an expert as long as your contribution is positively recognized by the masses.


One thought on “Week 5 prompt

  1. In my community observation paper, I mentioned the leadership and expertise gained through level of activity and number of followers but when posed with this prompt I did not consider that aspect in whether I would trust the article or posting credibility. To support my paper findings I would like to say that I would associated this with source credibility/expertise but I think that their is still a level of qualification necessary to claim expertise.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s